This site uses cookies.

The types of cookies we use, and the way we use them, are explained in our Privacy Policy. By clicking "Accept" or continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of Cookies.
More information


Brian Madigan LL.B., Broker

RE/MAX West Realty Inc.,
Independently owned and operated

96 Rexdale Blvd. 
Toronto, Ontario 

Phone: 416-745-2300

Cell: 647-404-8150 
Toll Free: 1-888-507-0817

Search in:  

Sort by:

Discovery of Defect Just Before Closing

October 12, 2016 - Updated: October 12, 2016

Discovery of Defect Just Before Closing


What happens if a defect of some kind is discovered right before closing?


This could easily take place on the Buyer’s final walkthrough. At this point, the Seller has moved out, and the Tenant has moved out, so things that were not quite so visible suddenly become quite apparent.


The Discovery


Let’s assume that it was a little bit of mould on the back of a board; that has been removed, and there is nothing left, then, the Buyer would be in breach for not closing. This is not a serious matter.


However, let’s assume the Buyer discovers mould and this leads to evidence of a chemical lab, marihuana grow house, toxic contamination, serious insect infestation, or underground stream that affects the underpinning of the building.


These matters would all be serious. They are important and they are material.


Buyer’s Options


Depending upon the circumstances, the Buyer may:


1)    Ignore the defect, and close the transaction,


2)    Close the transaction with an abatement of price, or


3)    Rescind the Agreement.


In many situations, the defects would be sufficiently serious so as to enable a Buyer to refuse to close and walk away from the deal. If there had been a home inspection that would not matter. No notice is necessary, and no alternative proposal needs to be made.


Nature of the Defect


The first and primary issue would be “how serious was the discovery”. Then, we have two other issues. Was this patent or latent? Patent means out in the open or highly visible, not covered up or concealed. If it was covered up or concealed in some way, then it would be a latent defect.


Seller’s Knowledge


The next issue to be determined is whether the Seller had knowledge. Often, that’s a difficult matter to prove, but with some digging and investigation (contractor’s estimates, insurance reports, police reports), something might pop up. In many cases, Courts will be somewhat generous and conclude that the Seller must have known. Evidence of concealment and non-disclosure are important factors here.


At this point, we really don’t know what the Buyer may have found, so we don’t know who has a good case, and who doesn’t.


The Law


A Seller has an obligation to disclose latent defects. Without such disclosure the Buyer has remedies. Active concealment could easily amount to fraud. If there is fraud, then the doctrine of caveat emptor does not apply.


Many times, discovery of very serious defects takes place just before closing. This can thwart the potential closing.



Brian Madigan LL.B., Broker

Tagged with: defect late discovery patent latent caveat emptor ontario law
| | Share

Brian Madigan LL.B. Broker

RE/MAX West Realty Inc. Brokerage

Independently owned and operated

96 Rexdale Blvd. , Toronto Ontario,

Phone: 416-745-2300

Powered by Lone Wolf Real Estate Technologies (CMS6)