This site uses cookies.

The types of cookies we use, and the way we use them, are explained in our Privacy Policy. By clicking "Accept" or continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of Cookies.
More information


 

Brian Madigan LL.B., Broker
BRMadigan@Rogers.com

RE/MAX West Realty Inc.,
Brokerage
Independently owned and operated

96 Rexdale Blvd. 
Toronto, Ontario 


Phone: 416-745-2300

Cell: 647-404-8150 
Toll Free: 1-888-507-0817

Search in:  
    
    
       

Sort by:

Latent and Patent Defects, and Material Facts

April 9, 2019 - Updated: April 9, 2019

 

Latent and Patent Defects, and Material Facts
 

The matter of patent and latent defects falls under the law of real property and the issue of disclosure.
 

Patent defect is clear, apparent, observable and not hidden from view.
 

Latent defect is not readily apparent to the eye and can only be determined with some degree of investigation.
 

material fact is a defined term under the Code of Ethics. Basically, it means something “important”, but it is defined to be “…..a fact that would affect a reasonable person’s decision to acquire or dispose of…..” an interest in property.
 

Registrants must investigate and determine material facts, and disclose them to clients. In respect to customers, the disclosure obligation is lessened somewhat to “known material facts” and those material facts which “ought to have been known”. In practice, there may not really be a distinction between these two standards.
 

The big difference arises when it comes to the seller. The seller is under no obligation whatsoever to disclose material facts, or any facts, at all. That is contrary to the registrant’s obligations and may bring them into conflict.
 

The seller basically has the right to remain silent. However, once he breaks his silence, then he must volunteer the truth.
 

The seller does not have to mention patent defects, because they should be obvious to all. The only obligation might arise in respect to latent defects which make the premises unsafe or unfit for human habitation. That proposition in respect to the law in Ontario is accepted, but it is not part of a binding legal decision, so there is really no precedent for it.
 

Any concealment of a patent defect could require comment and disclosure by the seller. Some courts have interpreted such an action to constitute a fraudulent activity and would be actionable.
 

When it comes to a seller’s obligation to disclose, that seems to be:
 

1)    patent defects, which are concealed, and

2)    latent defects, which render the premises unsafe or unfit for human habitation.
 

Naturally, there are sellers like new home builders whose obligations are regulated by statute.
 

 

Brian Madigan LL.B., Broker

www.iSourceRealEstate.com


Tagged with: disclosure latent defects patent defects material facts ontario
| | Share

Brian Madigan LL.B. Broker

RE/MAX West Realty Inc. Brokerage

Independently owned and operated

96 Rexdale Blvd. , Toronto Ontario,

Phone: 416-745-2300

BRMadigan@Rogers.com

Powered by Lone Wolf Real Estate Technologies (CMS6)